Dixon v. Reid

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedApril 23, 2024
Docket1:23-cv-09878
StatusUnknown

This text of Dixon v. Reid (Dixon v. Reid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dixon v. Reid, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EDLOECC #T:R ONIC ALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 4/23/2 024 -------------------------------------------------------------- X : DREW DIXON, : : Plaintiff, : : -against- : ORDER : ANTONIO MARQUIS L.A. REID, : 23-CV-9878 (VEC) : Defendant. : : -------------------------------------------------------------- X PROTECTIVE ORDER 1. This Order is being entered to facilitate the production, exchange, and discovery of documents and information that the Parties, and as appropriate, non-parties, believe in good faith merit Confidential treatment. The Parties were unable to agree on all material terms, so the Court is entering an order that is broadly consistent with the provisions the Parties could agree on. The Parties have informed the court that it is their intent that information will not be designated as Confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing will be so designated unless it is sensitive information and there is a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 2. Nothing in this Protective Order shall be interpreted or construed as changing any burden of proof or persuasion with respect to any Confidentiality designation or burden with respect to any sealing request. 3. “Designating Party” shall mean the Parties to this action and any non-party designating discovery as Confidential. 4. “Receiving Party” shall mean the Parties to this action and any non-party receiving, or who has been informed that, discovery has been designated as Confidential. 5. “Producing Party” shall mean the parties to this action and any non-parties who produce discovery in the action.

6. With respect to discovery (i.e., documents, information or tangible things of any kind produced or disclosed in the course of discovery in this action) (“Discovery Material”) that has been designated as “Confidential” pursuant to this Order, no Receiving Party may disclose such Confidential Discovery Material to anyone else except as expressly permitted hereunder. 7. The Designating Party may designate as Confidential only the portion of such Discovery Material that it reasonably and in good faith believes consists of proprietary, trade secret or other sensitive, non-public information. This includes without limitation the following: (a) medical, mental health and/or other health care records; (b) Social Security numbers, personal telephone numbers and emails, physical addresses and/or financial information of any person;

(c) names of alleged victims of sexual abuse/harassment and sexual partners; (d) personnel and other non-public employment records; (e) private, sensitive information regarding a Party’s or non-parties’ personal life and; (f) extracts and summaries of any information identified in (a)–(e); (g) any other category of information given confidential status by this Court after the date of this Order. 8. With respect to the Confidential portion of any Discovery Material other than deposition transcripts and exhibits, the Designating Party or his or her respective counsel may designate such portion as “Confidential” by: (a) stamping or otherwise clearly marking as “Confidential” the protected portion in a manner that will not interfere with legibility or

audibility; and (b) producing for future public use another copy of said Discovery Material with the confidential information redacted. 9. A Designating Party or his or her counsel may designate deposition exhibits or portions of deposition transcripts as Confidential Discovery Material either by: (a) indicating on the record during the deposition that a question calls for Confidential information, in which case the reporter will bind the transcript of the designated testimony in a separate volume and mark it as “Confidential Information Governed by Protective Order;” or (b) notifying the reporter and all counsel of record, in writing, within 30 days after a deposition has concluded, of the specific pages and lines of the transcript that are to be designated “Confidential,” in which case all counsel receiving the transcript will be responsible for marking the copies of the designated

transcript in their possession or under their control as Confidential. During the 30-day period following a deposition, all Parties will treat the entire deposition transcript as if it had been designated Confidential. If at any time before the termination of this action a Designating Party realizes that it should have designated as Confidential some portion(s) of Discovery Material that it previously produced or received without limitation, the Designating Party may so designate such material by notifying all Parties in writing. Thereafter, the Receiving Party will treat such designated portion(s) of the Discovery Material as Confidential. In addition, the Designating Party shall provide all Parties with replacement versions of such Discovery Material that bears the “Confidential” designation within two business days of providing such notice. 10. Nothing contained in this Order will be construed as: (a) a waiver by a Party or non-party of its right to object to any discovery request; (b) a waiver of any privilege or protection; or (c) a ruling regarding the admissibility at trial of any document, testimony, or other evidence.

11. Where a Designating Party has designated Discovery Material as Confidential, the Receiving Party may disclose such information to only the following persons: (a) the Parties to this action; (b) counsel retained specifically for this action, including any paralegal, clerical, or other assistant that such outside counsel employs and assigns to this matter; (c) outside vendors or service providers (such as copy-service providers and document-management consultants) that counsel hire and assign to this matter, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto; (d) any mediator or arbitrator that the Parties engage in this matter or that this

Court appoints, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto; (e) any deposition witness who is advised of this Protective Order and agrees on the record to maintain the information as Confidential; (f) any witness who counsel for a Party in good faith believes may be called to testify at trial or deposition in this action, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto; (g) any person a Party retains to serve as an expert witness or otherwise provide specialized advice to counsel in connection with this action, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto; (h) stenographers engaged to transcribe depositions the Parties conduct in this action; and

(i) this Court, including any appellate court, its support personnel, and court reporters. 12. Before disclosing any Confidential Discovery Material to any person referred to in subparagraphs 11(c), 11(d), 11(e), or 11(f) above, counsel must provide a copy of this Order to such person, who must sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto stating that he or she has read this Order and agrees to be bound by its terms. Said counsel must retain each signed Non-Disclosure Agreement, hold it in escrow, and produce it to opposing counsel either before such person is permitted to testify (at deposition or trial) or at the conclusion of the case including any and all appeals, whichever comes first. 13. For the avoidance of doubt, nothing in Paragraph 11 shall impose any limitation

on the ability of a Producing Party to disclose its own Confidential Discovery Material.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dixon v. Reid, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-reid-nysd-2024.