Dixon v. . R. R.
This text of 52 S.E. 673 (Dixon v. . R. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was evidence of the plaintiff tending to show that on the night of 28 August, 1904, in the town of Black Mountain, N.C. an engine of the defendant was backing towards the crossing near the depot and ran over and killed the intestate; that at the time of the killing the intestate was lawfully and rightfully upon the defendant's track, endeavoring to cross it, going to his home immediately south of the railroad; that the engine was running backward at the time without lights or signal warnings, and without anyone being stationed so as to keep a proper lookout. There was evidence of the defendant tending to contradict the plaintiff's testimony. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant excepted and appealed. The jury have accepted the plaintiff's version of the occurrence, and these facts fix the defendant with the legal responsibility for intestate's death. The case is governed by the decision in Reid v. R. R., ante, 146. We find no error which entitles the defendant to a new trial.
Affirmed. *Page 152
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 S.E. 673, 140 N.C. 201, 1905 N.C. LEXIS 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-r-r-nc-1905.