Dixon v. Pierce
1 Root 138
Opinion
This is a case within the statute, where no- more cost than' damages is to be recovered; and as the severance may be made, the court reversed the judgment only as to that part which was-illegal, viz. all the cost over the sum of the damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dixon v. Pierce, 1 Root 138 (Colo. Ct. App. 1789).
1 Root 138 (Dixon v. Pierce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Selleck v. Rusco
46 Conn. 370 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1878)
Zaleski v. Clark
45 Conn. 397 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1877)
Lisbon v. Lyman
49 N.H. 553 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1870)