Dixon v. Pearce

646 So. 2d 564, 1994 Ala. LEXIS 404, 1994 WL 421601
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided August 12, 1994·No. 1930761·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

RICHARD L. JONES, Retired Justice.

Because, in their attempt to enforce the statutory right of redemption following a mortgage foreclosure sale, the debtors/re-demptioners failed to comply with the “tender of payment” provisions of Ala.Code 1975, §§ 6-5-252 and -253, the judgment dismissing their claim as to defendant David Pearce is affirmed.

This opinion was prepared by retired Justice RICHARD L. JONES, sitting as a Justice of this Court pursuant to § 12-18-10(e), Ala.Code 1975, and it is hereby adopted as that of the Court.

AFFIRMED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and SHORES, HOUSTON and COOK, JJ., concur. MADDOX, J., concurs in the result. STEAGALL and INGRAM, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dixon v. Pearce, 646 So. 2d 564, 1994 Ala. LEXIS 404, 1994 WL 421601 (Ala. 1994).

646 So. 2d 564 (Dixon v. Pearce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dixon v. Farm Credit Bank of Texas
689 So. 2d 135 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1996)