Dixon v. Parker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dixon v. Parker

10 A.D.2d 983, 202 N.Y.S.2d 801, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9710

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 23, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 983 (Dixon v. Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dixon v. Parker, 10 A.D.2d 983, 202 N.Y.S.2d 801, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9710 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

As a result of a collision in Orange County between two motor vehicles, three separate actions to recover damages were brought in the Supreme Court. • Action No. 1 was commenced by the plaintiff in Orange County. Action No. 2 was commenced by the plaintiff in [984]*984Kings County. Action No. 3 was commenced by the plaintiffs in Kings County. Plaintiffs in Action No. 3 appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated October 26, 1959, which granted the motion of the plaintiff in Action No. 1: (a) to remove Actions Nos. 2 and 3 from Kings County tr Orange County, and (b) for a joint trial of the three actions in Orange County. Order affirmed, without costs. Upon the submission of this appeal and by confirming letter, this court was advised that during the pendency of the appeal, Action No. 1 was settled and discontinued. Accordingly, this affirmance is without prejudice to any proceeding or application which any of the parties in Action No. 2 or Action No. 3 may be advised to institute or make in furtherance of any rights which may be asserted by reason of any change in circumstances resulting from the aforesaid development. Beldoek, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

As a result of a collision in Orange County between two motor vehicles, three separate actions to recover damages were brought in the Supreme Court. • Action No. 1 was commenced by the plaintiff in Orange County. Action No. 2 was commenced by the plaintiff in [984]*984Kings County. Action No. 3 was commenced by the plaintiffs in Kings County. Plaintiffs in Action No. 3 appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated October 26, 1959, which granted the motion of the plaintiff in Action No. 1: (a) to remove Actions Nos. 2 and 3 from Kings County tr Orange County, and (b) for a joint trial of the three actions in Orange County. Order affirmed, without costs. Upon the submission of this appeal and by confirming letter, this court was advised that during the pendency of the appeal, Action No. 1 was settled and discontinued. Accordingly, this affirmance is without prejudice to any proceeding or application which any of the parties in Action No. 2 or Action No. 3 may be advised to institute or make in furtherance of any rights which may be asserted by reason of any change in circumstances resulting from the aforesaid development. Beldoek, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 983, 202 N.Y.S.2d 801, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-parker-nyappdiv-1960.