Dixon v. Mitchell
This text of Dixon v. Mitchell (Dixon v. Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8412
ROBERT H. DIXON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
R. DAVID MITCHELL, Superintendent, Mountain View Correctional Institution; NURSE PRESNELL, RN, Mountain View Correctional Institution,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00473-GCM)
Submitted: March 12, 2009 Decided: March 17, 2009
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert H. Dixon, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Robert H. Dixon appeals the district court’s order
denying him leave to file an amended complaint after the action
had already been dismissed. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Dixon v. Mitchell, No.
1:08-cv-00473-GCM (W.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2008). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dixon v. Mitchell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-mitchell-ca4-2009.