Dixon v. Martin-Saunders Co.

117 S.E. 96, 30 Ga. App. 46, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 237
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 7, 1923
Docket14040
StatusPublished

This text of 117 S.E. 96 (Dixon v. Martin-Saunders Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dixon v. Martin-Saunders Co., 117 S.E. 96, 30 Ga. App. 46, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 237 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

This was a claim case. The verdict in favor of the plaintiff in fi. fa. was not authorized by the evidence, and the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

■Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodivorth, ■/•/., eoneur. ' N. J. Norman, for plaintiif in error. Darsey & Mills, contra/

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 S.E. 96, 30 Ga. App. 46, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-martin-saunders-co-gactapp-1923.