Dixon v. Klopman

Supreme Court of Florida

Dixon v. Klopman

196 So. 2d 108

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedNovember 9, 1966

DocketNo. 35279

StatusPublished

This text of 196 So. 2d 108 (Dixon v. Klopman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dixon v. Klopman, 196 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 23, 1966.

After having heard oral argument, and after our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs, we conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petitions for certiorari and for attorney’s fees are therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur. THOMAS, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 23, 1966.

After having heard oral argument, and after our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs, we conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petitions for certiorari and for attorney’s fees are therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur. THOMAS, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 So. 2d 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-klopman-fla-1966.