Dixon v. Kirby
This text of Dixon v. Kirby (Dixon v. Kirby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7115
DAVID LAWRENCE DIXON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PAUL KIRBY, Commissioner; HOWARD H. PAINTER, Warden of Mt. Olive Correctional Complex; PATRICIA HANSHAW, Mount Olive Correctional Complex Mailroom Supervisor; PAUL RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner of Corrections, Nominal Defendant,
Defendants - Appellees.
PAPER WINGS; ROSE COMICS (EROS); PRISON PASSION; CRUTCHFIELD; M & P SALES; MUSIC BY MAIL; TAPE KINGZ; BUD PLANT COMIC ART,
Parties in Interest.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-289-5)
Submitted: October 10, 2002 Decided: October 17, 2002
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Lawrence Dixon, Appellant Pro Se. Daynus Jividen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Charleston, West Virginia; Charles Patrick Houdyschell, Jr., WEST VIRGINIA DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
David Lawrence Dixon appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the
magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Dixon v. Kirby, No. CA-01-289-5 (S.D.W. Va. July 16, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dixon v. Kirby, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-kirby-ca4-2002.