Dixon v. Kirby

Fourth Circuit

Dixon v. Kirby

48 F. App'x 93

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 17, 2002·No. No. 02-7115·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David Lawrence Dixon appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Dixon v. Kirby, No. CA-01-289-5 (S.D.W.Va. July 16, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented [94] in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

David Lawrence Dixon appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Dixon v. Kirby, No. CA-01-289-5 (S.D.W.Va. July 16, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented [94] in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Dixon v. Kirby, 48 F. App'x 93 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

48 F. App'x 93 (Dixon v. Kirby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related