Dixon v. Jones

Missouri Court of Appeals

Dixon v. Jones

229 S.W.3d 637, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1083, 2007 WL 2175045

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 31, 2007·No. WD 66823·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lydia Jones appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of Duane Dixon on his claims for unlawful detainer and replevin. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment awarding Dixon $9,998.55 in damages. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lydia Jones appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of Duane Dixon on his claims for unlawful detainer and replevin. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment awarding Dixon $9,998.55 in damages. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Dixon v. Jones, 229 S.W.3d 637, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1083, 2007 WL 2175045 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

229 S.W.3d 637 (Dixon v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.