Dixon v. Hazelwood

Fourth Circuit

Dixon v. Hazelwood

450 F. App'x 317

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 19, 2011·No. No. 11-1443·Published

Opinion

[318]*318Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Dixon appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dixon v. Hazelwood, No. 3:11-cv-00080-REP (E.D.Va. Feb. 23, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[318]*318Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Dixon appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dixon v. Hazelwood, No. 3:11-cv-00080-REP (E.D.Va. Feb. 23, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Dixon v. Hazelwood, 450 F. App'x 317 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

450 F. App'x 317 (Dixon v. Hazelwood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.