Dixon v. Great Falls & Old Dominion Railway Co.

D.C. Circuit

Dixon v. Great Falls & Old Dominion Railway Co.

38 App. D.C. 598, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 2176

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedApril 22, 1912

DocketNo. 2373

StatusPublished

This text of 38 App. D.C. 598 (Dixon v. Great Falls & Old Dominion Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dixon v. Great Falls & Old Dominion Railway Co., 38 App. D.C. 598, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 2176 (D.C. Cir. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Van Orsdel

delivered the opinion of the Court:

Appellant, Eobert A. Dixon, brought this suit against the defendant, the Great Falls & Old Dominion Railway Company, to recover damages for loss of services of his wife, Mary L. Dixon, appellant in case No. 2,312, ante, 591. As his right of recovery must depend largely upon the final disposition of that case, the judgment in this cause will be reversed, and remanded for further proceedings. Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Van Orsdel

delivered the opinion of the Court:

Appellant, Eobert A. Dixon, brought this suit against the defendant, the Great Falls & Old Dominion Railway Company, to recover damages for loss of services of his wife, Mary L. Dixon, appellant in case No. 2,312, ante, 591. As his right of recovery must depend largely upon the final disposition of that case, the judgment in this cause will be reversed, and remanded for further proceedings. Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 App. D.C. 598, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 2176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-great-falls-old-dominion-railway-co-cadc-1912.