Dixon v. Goethals
242 U.S. 616, 37 S. Ct. 211, 61 L. Ed. 529, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1412
This text of 242 U.S. 616 (Dixon v. Goethals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dixon v. Goethals, 242 U.S. 616, 37 S. Ct. 211, 61 L. Ed. 529, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1412 (1916).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of McCollum v. Eager, 2 How. 61; Thomas v. Wooldridge, 23 Wall. 283; Buffington v. Harvey, 95 U. S. 99; Rexford v. Brunswick-Balke-Collander Co., 228 U. S. 339, 346. Mr. Benjamin T. Waldo and Mr. Challen B. Ellis for the appellants. The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for the appellees.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
John McCollum in Error v. Jenison Eager
43 U.S. 61 (Supreme Court, 1844)
Thomas & Co. v. Wooldridge
90 U.S. 283 (Supreme Court, 1875)
Buffington v. Harvey
95 U.S. 99 (Supreme Court, 1877)
Rexford v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.
228 U.S. 339 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
242 U.S. 616, 37 S. Ct. 211, 61 L. Ed. 529, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-goethals-scotus-1916.