Dixon v. Goethals
242 U.S. 616, 37 S. Ct. 211, 61 L. Ed. 529, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1412
Opinion
Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of McCollum v. Eager, 2 How. 61; Thomas v. Wooldridge, 23 Wall. 283; Buffington v. Harvey, 95 U. S. 99; Rexford v. Brunswick-Balke-Collander Co., 228 U. S. 339, 346. Mr. Benjamin T. Waldo and Mr. Challen B. Ellis for the appellants. The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for the appellees.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dixon v. Goethals, 242 U.S. 616, 37 S. Ct. 211, 61 L. Ed. 529, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1412 (1916).
242 U.S. 616 (Dixon v. Goethals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
John McCollum in Error v. Jenison Eager
43 U.S. 61 (Supreme Court, 1844)
Thomas & Co. v. Wooldridge
90 U.S. 283 (Supreme Court, 1875)
Buffington v. Harvey
95 U.S. 99 (Supreme Court, 1877)
Rexford v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.
228 U.S. 339 (Supreme Court, 1913)