Dixon v. Gallon

133 A. 213, 104 Conn. 740, 1926 Conn. LEXIS 154
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 7, 1926·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*741 Per Curiam.

The errors assigned in the appeal are from rulings on evidence and from the charge as made. Since neither appellant, nor appellee, filed a statement of what each offered evidence to prove and claimed to have proved, the trial court should have either required the parties to comply with the rules, or have refused to make a finding. It is impossible for us to pass upon either the rulings on evidence or the parts of the charge complained of without having before us a statement of the facts which each party claimed to have proved and offered evidence to prove.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dixon v. Gallon, 133 A. 213, 104 Conn. 740, 1926 Conn. LEXIS 154 (Colo. 1926).

133 A. 213 (Dixon v. Gallon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Mulvey
213 A.2d 228 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1965)