Dixon v. Gallon
This text of 133 A. 213 (Dixon v. Gallon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The errors assigned in the appeal are from rulings on evidence and from the charge as made. Since neither appellant, nor appellee, filed a statement of what each offered evidence to prove and claimed to have proved, the trial court should have either required the parties to comply with the rules, or have refused to make a finding. It is impossible for us to pass upon either the rulings on evidence or the parts of the charge complained of without having before us a statement of the facts which each party claimed to have proved and offered evidence to prove.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
133 A. 213, 104 Conn. 740, 1926 Conn. LEXIS 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-gallon-conn-1926.