Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Dixon v. Eastern State Construction Co.

Dixon v. Eastern State Construction Co.

39 A.D.3d 230, 831 N.Y.S.2d 705
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 3, 2007
StatusPublished

This text of 39 A.D.3d 230 (Dixon v. Eastern State Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dixon v. Eastern State Construction Co., 39 A.D.3d 230, 831 N.Y.S.2d 705 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered July 24, 2006, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to reinstate the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff demonstrated a sufficient excuse for the delay, in that he was relying on his prior counsel’s misrepresentations that the matter was progressing (see Pagan v Estate of Anglero, [231]*23122 AD3d 285 [2005]). Plaintiff demonstrated he had a sufficiently meritorious cause of action to warrant going forward. Concur—Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Marlow, Williams and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pagan v. Estate of Anglero
22 A.D.3d 285 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 A.D.3d 230, 831 N.Y.S.2d 705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-eastern-state-construction-co-nyappdiv-2007.