Dixon v. Dorney

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Dixon v. Dorney

588 A.2d 322, 1991 Me. LEXIS 91

DecidedApril 2, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 588 A.2d 322 (Dixon v. Dorney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dixon v. Dorney, 588 A.2d 322, 1991 Me. LEXIS 91 (Me. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs Alphonso A. Dixon, Sr., and Beverly J. Dixon appeal from an adverse judgment entered after a jury trial in the Superior Court (Somerset County, Browne, J.) on their complaint alleging that a medical misdiagnosis caused the closing of their convenience store. Plaintiffs have not challenged the jury’s express finding that the diagnosis of their daughter’s infectious hepatitis by defendant was correct. Rather, they contend that the court erred in a number of evidentiary rulings and jury instructions relating to subsidiary issues. Because of the specific finding made by the jury, the errors complained of could not have affected the jury’s verdict. Even if established, such errors would be harmless. See State v. True, 438 A.2d 460, 467 (Me.1981).

The issues raised by plaintiffs on this appeal have no merit and plaintiffs’ counsel could not reasonably have believed that they had any chance of success. We find their appeal to be frivolous. See International Silver Co. v. DiGirolamo, 475 A.2d 1143, 1145 (Me.1984). Accordingly, we impose treble costs and attorney fees in the amount of $500, to be paid by plaintiffs’ attorney to the defendant and her attorney. 14 M.R.S.A. § 1802 (1980); M.R.Civ.P. 76(f).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed. Plaintiffs’ attorney ordered to pay treble costs and $500 attorney fees to defendant.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs Alphonso A. Dixon, Sr., and Beverly J. Dixon appeal from an adverse judgment entered after a jury trial in the Superior Court (Somerset County, Browne, J.) on their complaint alleging that a medical misdiagnosis caused the closing of their convenience store. Plaintiffs have not challenged the jury’s express finding that the diagnosis of their daughter’s infectious hepatitis by defendant was correct. Rather, they contend that the court erred in a number of evidentiary rulings and jury instructions relating to subsidiary issues. Because of the specific finding made by the jury, the errors complained of could not have affected the jury’s verdict. Even if established, such errors would be harmless. See State v. True, 438 A.2d 460, 467 (Me.1981).

The issues raised by plaintiffs on this appeal have no merit and plaintiffs’ counsel could not reasonably have believed that they had any chance of success. We find their appeal to be frivolous. See International Silver Co. v. DiGirolamo, 475 A.2d 1143, 1145 (Me.1984). Accordingly, we impose treble costs and attorney fees in the amount of $500, to be paid by plaintiffs’ attorney to the defendant and her attorney. 14 M.R.S.A. § 1802 (1980); M.R.Civ.P. 76(f).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed. Plaintiffs’ attorney ordered to pay treble costs and $500 attorney fees to defendant.

All concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

588 A.2d 322, 1991 Me. LEXIS 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-dorney-me-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack