Dixon v. Dixon
This text of 61 Ill. 324 (Dixon v. Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plea to the jurisdiction in this case presented the question whether the court of common pleas of the city of Amboy has power to send its process beyond the territorial limits of the city. This question is decided by the cases of People v. Evans, 18 Ill. 361, and Covill v. Phy, 26 ib. 433. The plea was good, and the court should have so held. The question as to the sufficiency of the plea was raised by demurrer. The proper mode in chancery proceedings is, to set the plea down for argument.
The decree is reversed and the cause remanded.
Decree reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 Ill. 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-dixon-ill-1871.