Dixon v. Dixon
194 So. 2d 897, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 4125
Opinions
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon consideration of the petition, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the petition is denied and the writ discharged.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dixon v. Dixon, 194 So. 2d 897, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 4125 (Fla. 1967).
194 So. 2d 897 (Dixon v. Dixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cantrell v. Home Life Ins. Co.
524 So. 2d 1063 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Johnson v. Feeney
507 So. 2d 722 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Harris v. Byard
501 So. 2d 730 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Boyd
781 F.2d 1494 (Eleventh Circuit, 1986)
Carpenter v. Carpenter
722 P.2d 298 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1985)
Lowry v. Lowry
463 So. 2d 540 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Roxy v. Roxy
454 So. 2d 84 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Vath v. Vath
432 So. 2d 806 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Pensyl v. Moore
415 So. 2d 771 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Rindels v. Prudential Life Insurance Co. of America, Inc.
489 P.2d 1179 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1971)