Dixon v. Dixon
This text of 194 So. 2d 897 (Dixon v. Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon consideration of the petition, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the petition is denied and the writ discharged.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
194 So. 2d 897, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 4125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-dixon-fla-1967.