Dixon v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Dixon v. Director of Revenue

895 S.W.2d 307, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 493

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 21, 1995·No. No. 65037·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Dixon appeals from a judgment of the trial court sustaining the Director of Revenue’s suspension of his driving privileges. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We affirm in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Dixon appeals from a judgment of the trial court sustaining the Director of Revenue’s suspension of his driving privileges. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We affirm in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Dixon v. Director of Revenue, 895 S.W.2d 307, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 493 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

895 S.W.2d 307 (Dixon v. Director of Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.