Dixon v. Columbia Glass Co.

California Court of Appeal

Dixon v. Columbia Glass Co.

64 P.2d 731, 18 Cal. App. 2d 765

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJanuary 29, 1937

DocketCiv. No. 11077

StatusPublished

This text of 64 P.2d 731 (Dixon v. Columbia Glass Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dixon v. Columbia Glass Co., 64 P.2d 731, 18 Cal. App. 2d 765 (Cal. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

McCOMB, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from an order made pursuant to section 357 of the Civil Code.

Appellant has not observed the provision of rule VIII, section 2 of this court, which requires that the question involved on appeal in a civil action must be set forth on the first page of the opening brief without any other matter appearing thereon and must never exceed one page. (Rule VIII, sec. 2, Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal of the State of California.) In the instant case the questions cover approximately two pages. Therefore, since it is the duty of counsel to comply with rule VIII, supra, in its entirety, the appeal is dismissed, pursuant to the penalty provided in section 4, rule VIII, supra. (Rule VIII, sec. 4, Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal of the State of California; Ferslew v. Andersen, 11 Cal. App. (2d) 400 [53 Pac. (2d) 768].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Grail, P. <T., and Wood, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCOMB, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from an order made pursuant to section 357 of the Civil Code.

Appellant has not observed the provision of rule VIII, section 2 of this court, which requires that the question involved on appeal in a civil action must be set forth on the first page of the opening brief without any other matter appearing thereon and must never exceed one page. (Rule VIII, sec. 2, Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal of the State of California.) In the instant case the questions cover approximately two pages. Therefore, since it is the duty of counsel to comply with rule VIII, supra, in its entirety, the appeal is dismissed, pursuant to the penalty provided in section 4, rule VIII, supra. (Rule VIII, sec. 4, Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal of the State of California; Ferslew v. Andersen, 11 Cal. App. (2d) 400 [53 Pac. (2d) 768].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Grail, P. <T., and Wood, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 P.2d 731, 18 Cal. App. 2d 765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-columbia-glass-co-calctapp-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack