Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Dixon v. City of Waynesboro

Dixon v. City of Waynesboro

74 S.E. 302, 10 Ga. App. 801, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 697
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 19, 1912
Docket3951
StatusPublished

This text of 74 S.E. 302 (Dixon v. City of Waynesboro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dixon v. City of Waynesboro, 74 S.E. 302, 10 Ga. App. 801, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 697 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

This being' a certiorari sued out to réview the judgment of a

municipal court, and there being in the petition no averment that the bond required by the act approved December 10, 1902 (Acts 1902, p. 105), had been given, or the pauper affidavit filed, and it nowhere appearing in the record that the bond or the pauper affidavit had been filed, there was' no error in dismissing tbe certiorari. McDonald v. Ludowici, 3 Ga. App. 654; Allen v. Atlanta, 7 Ga. App. 99; Veassey v. Crawfordville, 126 Ga. 89. . Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Veazey v. Mayor of Crawfordville
54 S.E. 817 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
McDonald v. Town of Ludowici
60 S.E. 337 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Allen v. City of Atlanta
66 S.E. 255 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 S.E. 302, 10 Ga. App. 801, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-city-of-waynesboro-gactapp-1912.