Dixon v. Astrue

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-2195

JERRY DIXON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (1:04-cv-00921-NCT-PTS)

Submitted: June 19, 2008 Decided: August 6, 2008

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph E. Wolfe, Norton, Virginia, for Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina; Robert J. Triba, Chief Regional Counsel, Christopher A. Michaels, Special Assistant United States Attorney, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jerry Dixon appeals the district court’s order adopting

the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying his motion for

summary judgment and granting the Commissioner’s motion for summary

judgment on his claim for disability insurance benefits and

supplemental security income under the Social Security Act. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Dixon v. Astrue, No. 1:04-cv-00921-NCT-PTS (M.D.N.C.

Oct. 3, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -