Dixon v. Alexander

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 6, 2005
Docket05-6043
StatusUnpublished

This text of Dixon v. Alexander (Dixon v. Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dixon v. Alexander, (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6043

PHILLIP ERNEST DIXON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DOCTOR ALEXANDER, Head of Psychiatric Department,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

MS. MENDOZA, Hospital Administrator; MR. NORWOOD, A/W Operations; KATHLEEN HAWK-SAWYER, Director, Bureau of Prisons; JOSEPH BROOKS, Warden,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-03-231)

Submitted: May 18, 2005 Decided: June 6, 2005

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Phillip Ernest Dixon, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Phillip Ernest Dixon appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named

Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Dixon v.

Alexander, No. CA-03-231 (E.D. Va. Nov. 9, 2004). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dixon v. Alexander, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-alexander-ca4-2005.