Dixon National Bank v. Western Lumber Co.

68 Mo. App. 81, 1896 Mo. App. LEXIS 494
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 14, 1896·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Ellison, J.

Plaintiff instituted this action by attachment. The controversy here is on the plea in abatement. The attachment was sustained in the court below on the authority of Bank v. Western Lumber Co., 59 Mo. App. 317.

attachment: veyances^sow" em debtor. The cause of attachment were those statutory grounds relating to a fraudulent disposition of property by defendant so as to hinder or delay its creditors. The chief question presented is whether an attachment will He against a solvent debtor who has made a fraudulent conveyance of a portion property. We held that it would

in Bank v. Western Lumber Co., 59 Mo. App. 317. The supreme court also held this to be a proper construction of the statute in Rock Island Nat. Bank v. Western Lumber Co., 34 S. W. Rep. 869; 35 S. W. Rep. 1132. Those cases were against the defendant here, and present the same facts.

We will, therefore, do no more than refer to them for the reasons governing the disposition of the cause. The judgment will be affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dixon National Bank v. Western Lumber Co., 68 Mo. App. 81, 1896 Mo. App. LEXIS 494 (Mo. Ct. App. 1896).

68 Mo. App. 81 (Dixon National Bank v. Western Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

First National Bank v. Kibble
273 S.W. 148 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1925)
Barry County Bank v. Russey
74 Mo. App. 651 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1898)