Dixon ex rel. Berry v. Swiggett
1 H. & J. 252
Opinion
The Court were of opinion, that the plaintiff in this case could not give any parol testimony to prove the nonpayment of the consideration money, contrary to his express acknowledgment of it on the face of the deed.
The PeaiNTief NONsuited.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dixon ex rel. Berry v. Swiggett, 1 H. & J. 252 (Va. Super. Ct. 1802).
1 H. & J. 252 (Dixon ex rel. Berry v. Swiggett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wolfe v. Hauver
1 Gill 84 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1843)
Lingan v. Henderson
1 Md. Ch. 236 (Maryland Chancery Ct, 1821)