Dixon Brothers Lumber & Supply v. Watson

1955 OK 67, 281 P.2d 182, 1955 Okla. LEXIS 409
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedMarch 15, 1955
Docket36771
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 1955 OK 67 (Dixon Brothers Lumber & Supply v. Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dixon Brothers Lumber & Supply v. Watson, 1955 OK 67, 281 P.2d 182, 1955 Okla. LEXIS 409 (Okla. 1955).

Opinion

WELCH, Justice.

On the 12th day of November, 1954, the State Industrial Commission, by trial commissioner, entered an order denying claimant an award finding that he was not an employee of respondent. The matter was appealed to the Commission en banc on December 9, 1954. The State Industrial Commission entered an order which is in part as follows:

“It is therefore ordered, That the order of the trial commissioner heretofore entered in this case on November 12th, 1954, be and the same is hereby reversed, and finds that claimant, Grover Watson, was an employee of Dixon Brothers Lumber and Supply Company on March 20th, 1954, and that said cause be remanded to the trial commissioner for further proceedings and that said order as modified be adopted and made the order of this Commission En Banc.”

A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that this order was not a final order under the provisions of 85 O.S.1951 § 29. The motion to dismiss must be sustained. This court has repeatedly held that an order of the trial court which vacates a former order or award and holds the same in abeyance until the final determination of the State Industrial Commission is not such an order as can be brought to this court prior to the order making or denying the award. Nelson v. Carter Oil *183 Co., 191 Okl. 388, 130 P.2d 289; Kansas Explorations v. Blaine, 195 Okl. 428, 158 P.2d 907; Armour & Co. v. Moore, 206 Okl. 72, 240 P.2d 1113, and Anchor Stone & Materials Co. v. Terry, 207 Okl. 690, 252 P.2d 443.

The proceeding to review the order is dismissed.

JOHNSON, C. J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and CORN, HALLEY, BLACKBIRD and JACKSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. State Industrial Court
1965 OK 179 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1965)
Dixon Brothers Lumber and Supply Co. v. Watson
1960 OK 148 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1960)
Kiespert v. Jenkins
1958 OK 92 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1958)
Vieth v. Cook
1957 OK 22 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1955 OK 67, 281 P.2d 182, 1955 Okla. LEXIS 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-brothers-lumber-supply-v-watson-okla-1955.