DIXIE VORTEX COMPANY v. Imperial Paper Box Corporation

Second Circuit

DIXIE VORTEX COMPANY v. Imperial Paper Box Corporation

100 F.2d 1013, 39 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 557

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedDecember 5, 1938

Docket93

StatusPublished

This text of 100 F.2d 1013 (DIXIE VORTEX COMPANY v. Imperial Paper Box Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DIXIE VORTEX COMPANY v. Imperial Paper Box Corporation, 100 F.2d 1013, 39 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 557 (2d Cir. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

100 F.2d 1013 (1938)

DIXIE VORTEX COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
IMPERIAL PAPER BOX CORPORATION and K. & W. Paper Novelty Corporation and Rose Radin, and Evelyn Sukoff, Copartners, Doing Business as Sunny Paper Novelty Co., and Morris Sukoff and Morris Lazow, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

December 5, 1938.

Carlton Hill, Charles W. Hills, Jr., Alexander C. Mabee, and M. R. Chambers, all of Chicago, Ill. (Duell & Kane, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

John P. Chandler, of New York City (H. C. Bierman, of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.

Before MANTON, SWAN and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree, 22 F.Supp. 209, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

100 F.2d 1013 (1938)

DIXIE VORTEX COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
IMPERIAL PAPER BOX CORPORATION and K. & W. Paper Novelty Corporation and Rose Radin, and Evelyn Sukoff, Copartners, Doing Business as Sunny Paper Novelty Co., and Morris Sukoff and Morris Lazow, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

December 5, 1938.

Carlton Hill, Charles W. Hills, Jr., Alexander C. Mabee, and M. R. Chambers, all of Chicago, Ill. (Duell & Kane, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

John P. Chandler, of New York City (H. C. Bierman, of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.

Before MANTON, SWAN and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree, 22 F.Supp. 209, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 F.2d 1013, 39 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixie-vortex-company-v-imperial-paper-box-corporation-ca2-1938.

Opinion

DIXIE VORTEX COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IMPERIAL PAPER BOX CORPORATION and K. & W. Paper Novelty Corporation and Rose Radin, and Evelyn Sukoff, Copartners, Doing Business as Sunny Paper Novelty Co., and Morris Sukoff and Morris Lazow, Defendants-Appellees.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

DIXIE VORTEX COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
IMPERIAL PAPER BOX CORPORATION and K. & W. Paper Novelty Corporation and Rose Radin, and Evelyn Sukoff, Copartners, Doing Business as Sunny Paper Novelty Co., and Morris Sukoff and Morris Lazow, Defendants-Appellees.