DIXIE VORTEX COMPANY v. Imperial Paper Box Corporation
100 F.2d 1013, 39 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 557
Opinion
DIXIE VORTEX COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
IMPERIAL PAPER BOX CORPORATION and K. & W. Paper Novelty Corporation and Rose Radin, and Evelyn Sukoff, Copartners, Doing Business as Sunny Paper Novelty Co., and Morris Sukoff and Morris Lazow, Defendants-Appellees.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Carlton Hill, Charles W. Hills, Jr., Alexander C. Mabee, and M. R. Chambers, all of Chicago, Ill. (Duell & Kane, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
John P. Chandler, of New York City (H. C. Bierman, of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.
Before MANTON, SWAN and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Decree, 22 F.Supp. 209, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
DIXIE VORTEX COMPANY v. Imperial Paper Box Corporation, 100 F.2d 1013, 39 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 557 (2d Cir. 1938).
100 F.2d 1013 (DIXIE VORTEX COMPANY v. Imperial Paper Box Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dixie-Vortex Co. v. Imperial Paper Box Corp.
22 F. Supp. 209 (E.D. New York, 1938)