Dixie v. Frank

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dixie v. Frank

695 So. 2d 739, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10361, 1996 WL 511531

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 11, 1996

DocketNo. 95-4580

StatusPublished

This text of 695 So. 2d 739 (Dixie v. Frank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dixie v. Frank, 695 So. 2d 739, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10361, 1996 WL 511531 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation case, we reverse the award of attendant care prior to November 22, 1995, because the claimant failed to meet her burden of proving the quantum of such care actually provided during that time period. See Bojangles v. Kuring, 598 So.2d 250, 251 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Ramada Inn S. Airport v. Lamoureux, 578 So.2d 48, 49 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 587 So.2d 1328 (Fla.1991). The remainder of the order is affirmed.

BARFIELD, C. J., and KAHN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation case, we reverse the award of attendant care prior to November 22, 1995, because the claimant failed to meet her burden of proving the quantum of such care actually provided during that time period. See Bojangles v. Kuring, 598 So.2d 250, 251 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Ramada Inn S. Airport v. Lamoureux, 578 So.2d 48, 49 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 587 So.2d 1328 (Fla.1991). The remainder of the order is affirmed.

BARFIELD, C. J., and KAHN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

695 So. 2d 739, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10361, 1996 WL 511531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixie-v-frank-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack