Dixie Towing Corp. v. Mobley

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dixie Towing Corp. v. Mobley

603 So. 2d 692, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9213, 1992 WL 201045

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dixie Towing Corp. v. Mobley. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12710 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 21, 1992·No. No. 91-2724·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In view of Appellees’ contentions at oral argument, we construe the appealed order (granting a directed verdict for Appellees as to the alleged defective condition of the tug and granting a new trial on damages) as requiring the court to receive evidence and submit to the jury the issue of whether the defective condition caused the injuries and damages claimed by Appellees, as well as the quantum and effect of Appellees’ comparative negligence. With the issues on appeal thereby refined and narrowed, the appealed order is AFFIRMED.

ZEHMER, WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In view of Appellees’ contentions at oral argument, we construe the appealed order (granting a directed verdict for Appellees as to the alleged defective condition of the tug and granting a new trial on damages) as requiring the court to receive evidence and submit to the jury the issue of whether the defective condition caused the injuries and damages claimed by Appellees, as well as the quantum and effect of Appellees’ comparative negligence. With the issues on appeal thereby refined and narrowed, the appealed order is AFFIRMED.

ZEHMER, WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Dixie Towing Corp. v. Mobley, 603 So. 2d 692, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9213, 1992 WL 201045 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

603 So. 2d 692 (Dixie Towing Corp. v. Mobley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.