Dixie Rental Agency v. King
This text of 191 So. 2d 566 (Dixie Rental Agency v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date 24 May 1966.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition and cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition and cross-petition for cer-tiorari are, therefore, denied.
The petition for fees is granted and claimant’s attorney is awarded a fee of $250.00.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 So. 2d 566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixie-rental-agency-v-king-fla-1966.