Dixie Ohio Express Company, Inc. v. Arthur H. Bertram

Sixth Circuit

Dixie Ohio Express Company, Inc. v. Arthur H. Bertram

181 F.2d 187, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2583

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedApril 18, 1950

Docket11044

StatusPublished

This text of 181 F.2d 187 (Dixie Ohio Express Company, Inc. v. Arthur H. Bertram) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dixie Ohio Express Company, Inc. v. Arthur H. Bertram, 181 F.2d 187, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2583 (6th Cir. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

*188 PER CURIAM.

This causé was heard upon the transcript of record, briefs and arguments of counsel, and on consideration thereof,

It is ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from and entered of record on the Minutes of the District Court on April 22, 1949, be and the same is in all things affirmed upon the authority of Inter-City Trucking Co. v. Daniels, 181 Tenn. 126, 137, 178 S.W.2d 756.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*188 PER CURIAM.

This causé was heard upon the transcript of record, briefs and arguments of counsel, and on consideration thereof,

It is ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from and entered of record on the Minutes of the District Court on April 22, 1949, be and the same is in all things affirmed upon the authority of Inter-City Trucking Co. v. Daniels, 181 Tenn. 126, 137, 178 S.W.2d 756.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 F.2d 187, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixie-ohio-express-company-inc-v-arthur-h-bertram-ca6-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack