Dixie Metal Products Co. v. Jones

135 S.E. 406, 163 Ga. 70, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 23
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 15, 1926
DocketNo. 5412
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 135 S.E. 406 (Dixie Metal Products Co. v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dixie Metal Products Co. v. Jones, 135 S.E. 406, 163 Ga. 70, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 23 (Ga. 1926).

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

“Creditors without lien can not, as a general rule, enjoin their debtors from disposing of property, nor obtain injunction or other extraordinary relief in equity.” Civil Code, § 5495. Moreover, “Equity will not take cognizance of - a plain legal right, where an adequate and complete remedy is provided by law.” § 4538. Furthermore, “The power of appointing receivers and ordering injunctions should be prudently and cautiously exercised, and except in clear and urgent cases should not be resorted to.” § 5477. Applying the foregoing principles as they were applied in the cases of Cooleewahee Co. v. Sparks, 148 Ga. 211 (96 S. E. 131), and Coe Mfg. Co. v. D. & L. Bank, 160 Ga. 675 (128 S. E. 908), the court did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. William P. Kennedy and Horace Bussell, for plaintiff. L. J. Steele and B. B. Blackburn, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ramsey v. Ramsey
165 S.E. 624 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
Jones v. Carter Electric Co.
137 S.E. 624 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 S.E. 406, 163 Ga. 70, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixie-metal-products-co-v-jones-ga-1926.