Dixie Insurance Company v. Federick

449 So. 2d 972, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12993
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 10, 1984
Docket83-925
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 449 So. 2d 972 (Dixie Insurance Company v. Federick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dixie Insurance Company v. Federick, 449 So. 2d 972, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12993 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

449 So.2d 972 (1984)

DIXIE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
Loretta FEDERICK, Appellee.

No. 83-925.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

May 10, 1984.

*973 Leslie King O'Neal of Markel, McDonough & O'Neal, Orlando, for appellant.

Walton B. Hallowes, Jr., of Wells, Gattis, Hallowes & Carpenter, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying both relief from a judgment and a stay of execution. Under the terms of its insurance policy, appellant was only obligated to pay $10,000.00 of the $35,000.00 judgment. Apparently the insured was unable to pay the other $25,000.00 so the plaintiff went after the insurance company to collect it. Because the insurance company's lawyers neglected to see to the original judgment being properly worded so as to limit the company's liability and later failed to bring it to the court's attention in a timely fashion, the trial judge ruled he lacked jurisdiction to grant relief. We are quite sympathetic with the position taken by the trial judge and note even the effort made in the last ditch attempt to save the situation could be deemed to have failed. However, we are moved to grant relief. We have decided to treat the insurance company's last motion as sufficient under Rule 1.540(b) and reverse the decision of the trial judge, so as to render justice. The order denying relief is reversed and this cause remanded for further proceedings to correct the judgment.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Collins v. Summers Hardware and Supply Co.
88 S.W.3d 192 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2002)
James Collins v. Summers Hrdwe & Supply Co.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2001
Spence v. Allstate Insurance Co.
883 S.W.2d 586 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1994)
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. LaForet
586 So. 2d 479 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Sottile v. Sottile
551 So. 2d 608 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Hutton v. Sussman
504 So. 2d 1372 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
449 So. 2d 972, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12993, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixie-insurance-company-v-federick-fladistctapp-1984.