Dixie Insurance Co. v. Coleman ex rel. Donkel

519 So. 2d 754, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 492, 1988 WL 8098
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 10, 1988·No. Nos. 87-1617, 87-3309·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We consolidate case Nos. 87-1617 and 87-3309. Upon review of the record, we conclude that there are issues of fact regarding the coverage dispute involved herein that preclude the disposition of this case by summary judgment. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent herewith.

ANSTEAD, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dixie Insurance Co. v. Coleman ex rel. Donkel, 519 So. 2d 754, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 492, 1988 WL 8098 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

519 So. 2d 754 (Dixie Insurance Co. v. Coleman ex rel. Donkel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pierce v. Aetna Ins. Co.
519 So. 2d 754 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)