Dix v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dix v. State

721 So. 2d 398, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14324, 1998 WL 796735

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dix v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1960 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 13, 1998·No. No. 97-00832·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Raymond T. Dix, III, appeals his judgment and sentence for first-degree arson. He also challenges the imposition of certain costs. We affirm the conviction and the portion of his sentence reflecting the imposition of costs, without discussion. The trial court, however, sentenced Dix as a habitual offender without the requisite number of prior convictions. Because Dix was improperly sentenced as a habitual offender, we reverse that portion of his sentence and remand for resentencing.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

WHATLEY, A.C.J., and NORTHCUTT and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Raymond T. Dix, III, appeals his judgment and sentence for first-degree arson. He also challenges the imposition of certain costs. We affirm the conviction and the portion of his sentence reflecting the imposition of costs, without discussion. The trial court, however, sentenced Dix as a habitual offender without the requisite number of prior convictions. Because Dix was improperly sentenced as a habitual offender, we reverse that portion of his sentence and remand for resentencing.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

WHATLEY, A.C.J., and NORTHCUTT and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.

Dix v. State, 721 So. 2d 398, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14324, 1998 WL 796735 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

721 So. 2d 398 (Dix v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.