Dix v. State
This text of 721 So. 2d 398 (Dix v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Raymond T. Dix, III, appeals his judgment and sentence for first-degree arson. He also challenges the imposition of certain costs. We affirm the conviction and the portion of his sentence reflecting the imposition of costs, without discussion. The trial court, however, sentenced Dix as a habitual offender without the requisite number of prior convictions. Because Dix was improperly sentenced as a habitual offender, we reverse that portion of his sentence and remand for resentencing.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
721 So. 2d 398, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14324, 1998 WL 796735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dix-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.