Divosta Building Corp. v. Rienzi

892 So. 2d 1212, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1387, 2005 WL 327141
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 11, 2005
DocketNo. 1D04-1082
StatusPublished

This text of 892 So. 2d 1212 (Divosta Building Corp. v. Rienzi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Divosta Building Corp. v. Rienzi, 892 So. 2d 1212, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1387, 2005 WL 327141 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The Judge of Compensation Claims held he lacked jurisdiction to determine whether an enforceable settlement agreement was reached. Based on this court’s recent opinions reaffirming that it is within the province of the Judge of Compensation Claims to determine whether a settlement agreement was reached, the order to the contrary is reversed. See Jacobsen v. Ross Stores, 882 So.2d 431 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Gerow v. Yesterday’s, 881 So.2d 94 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). The case is remanded for a ruling on the motion to enforce the settlement.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

BARFIELD and KAHN, JJ., concur; ERVIN, J., concurs with written opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jacobsen v. Stores
882 So. 2d 431 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Gerow v. Yesterday's
881 So. 2d 94 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
State v. Dubose
11 So. 2d 477 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1943)
American Can Co. v. City of Tampa
14 So. 2d 203 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1942)
United States Gypsum Co. v. Columbia Casualty Co.
169 So. 532 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
892 So. 2d 1212, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1387, 2005 WL 327141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/divosta-building-corp-v-rienzi-fladistctapp-2005.