Divosta Building Corp. v. Rienzi
This text of 892 So. 2d 1212 (Divosta Building Corp. v. Rienzi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The Judge of Compensation Claims held he lacked jurisdiction to determine whether an enforceable settlement agreement was reached. Based on this court’s recent opinions reaffirming that it is within the province of the Judge of Compensation Claims to determine whether a settlement agreement was reached, the order to the contrary is reversed. See Jacobsen v. Ross Stores, 882 So.2d 431 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Gerow v. Yesterday’s, 881 So.2d 94 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). The case is remanded for a ruling on the motion to enforce the settlement.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
892 So. 2d 1212, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1387, 2005 WL 327141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/divosta-building-corp-v-rienzi-fladistctapp-2005.