Divita
This text of Divita (Divita) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
JENNIFER F. DIVITA, Individually and § as Administratrix of the Estate of § No. 225, 2014 BENNY DIVITA II, Deceased, and as § Parent and Next Friend of § BECKETT DIVITA, a Minor, § Court Below: § Plaintiff Below, § Superior Court Appellant, § of the State of Delaware § in and for Sussex County § v. § C.A. No. S10C-03-030 § BAYHEALTH MEDICAL CENTER, INC. § (at Kent General Hospital), a § Delaware Corporation, § § Defendant Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: November 12, 2014 Decided: November 13, 2014
Before STRINE, Chief Justice, RIDGELY, and VALIHURA, Justices.
ORDER
This 13th day of November 2014, upon consideration of the briefs and
arguments of the parties and the record below, it appears to the Court that the
Appellant raises one argument on appeal. Appellant argues that the Superior Court
erred when it admitted into evidence a video animation showing the regurgitation
and aspiration of a person’s stomach contents into his lungs. Appellant claims that the admission into evidence of the video animation was untimely, speculative and
prejudicial. We find that the Superior Court did not abuse its discretion when
admitting the evidence on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Superior
Court in its Order dated April 14, 2014.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the
Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Divita, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/divita-del-2014.