Division of Workers' Compensation, Bureau of Crimes Compensation v. Tucker ex rel. Gaddis
This text of 412 So. 2d 930 (Division of Workers' Compensation, Bureau of Crimes Compensation v. Tucker ex rel. Gaddis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Without being specific, the deputy commissioner awarded “out-of-pocket costs incurred by the claimant, pursuant to Section 960.08 of the Florida Statutes,” in addition to other benefits under the Florida Crimes Compensation Act. In this appeal, the Bureau contends that this award of “costs” is not authorized by statute.
We construe the order as awarding proper Section 960.08 (1980 Supp.) expenses, which include only those costs relating to care and treatment or other services related to the injury. The statute does not empower a deputy to award costs of the litigation, such as attorney’s fees, witness fees, or deposition expense. See Department of Labor and Employment Security v. Cade, 400 So.2d 171 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
As construed, the deputy’s order is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
412 So. 2d 930, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/division-of-workers-compensation-bureau-of-crimes-compensation-v-tucker-fladistctapp-1982.