Division of Pensions v. Lindeman
248 A.2d 427, 53 N.J. 70, 1968 N.J. LEXIS 571
This text of 248 A.2d 427 (Division of Pensions v. Lindeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Division of Pensions v. Lindeman, 248 A.2d 427, 53 N.J. 70, 1968 N.J. LEXIS 571 (N.J. 1968).
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Herbert in the Chancery Division, 103 N. J. Super. 375.
For affirmance—Justices Jacobs, Erancis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Haneman—6.
For reversal—Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
In Re Brennan
314 A.2d 610 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1974)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
248 A.2d 427, 53 N.J. 70, 1968 N.J. LEXIS 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/division-of-pensions-v-lindeman-nj-1968.