Division of Pensions v. Lindeman
248 A.2d 427, 53 N.J. 70, 1968 N.J. LEXIS 571
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Herbert in the Chancery Division, 103 N. J. Super. 375.
For affirmance—Justices Jacobs, Erancis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Haneman—6.
For reversal—Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Division of Pensions v. Lindeman, 248 A.2d 427, 53 N.J. 70, 1968 N.J. LEXIS 571 (N.J. 1968).
248 A.2d 427 (Division of Pensions v. Lindeman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
In Re Brennan
314 A.2d 610 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1974)