Division of Natural Resources v. Division of Environmental Protection

West Virginia Court of Claims

Division of Natural Resources v. Division of Environmental Protection

21 Ct. Cl. 183

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedApril 11, 1997

DocketCC-97-61A

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Ct. Cl. 183 (Division of Natural Resources v. Division of Environmental Protection) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Division of Natural Resources v. Division of Environmental Protection, 21 Ct. Cl. 183 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

[184]*184This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and the respondent’s Answer.

Claimant seeks $1,064.49 for telephone bills and telephone repair bills incurred by claimant on behalf of the respondent State agency in May 1995 and March 1996. The documentation for the telephone services was not received by the respondent in the proper fiscal years; therefore, the claimant has not been paid. In its Answer, the respondent admits the validity of the claim, and states that there were sufficient funds expired in the appropriate fiscal years with which the claim could have been paid.

In view of the foregoing, the Court makes an award in the amount of $1,064.49.

Award of $1,064.49.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

[184]*184This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and the respondent’s Answer.

Claimant seeks $1,064.49 for telephone bills and telephone repair bills incurred by claimant on behalf of the respondent State agency in May 1995 and March 1996. The documentation for the telephone services was not received by the respondent in the proper fiscal years; therefore, the claimant has not been paid. In its Answer, the respondent admits the validity of the claim, and states that there were sufficient funds expired in the appropriate fiscal years with which the claim could have been paid.

In view of the foregoing, the Court makes an award in the amount of $1,064.49.

Award of $1,064.49.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Ct. Cl. 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/division-of-natural-resources-v-division-of-environmental-protection-wvctcl-1997.