Division of Highways v. Division of Rehabilitation Services

West Virginia Court of Claims

Division of Highways v. Division of Rehabilitation Services

21 Ct. Cl. 1

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedJuly 3, 1995

DocketCC-95-46

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Ct. Cl. 1 (Division of Highways v. Division of Rehabilitation Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Division of Highways v. Division of Rehabilitation Services, 21 Ct. Cl. 1 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and the respondent's Answer.

Claimant seeks payment of $3,756.36 for telephone charges which were incurred by claimant on behalf of the respondent State agency. These telephone charges were not reimbursed by respondent to the claimant in the proper fiscal year; therefore, the claimant has not been paid. In its Answer, the respondent admits the validity and amount of the claim, and states that there were sufficient funds expired in the appropriate fiscal year with which the travel expenses could have been paid.

In view of the foregoing, the Court makes an award in the amount of $3,756.36.

Award of $3,756.36.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and the respondent's Answer.

Claimant seeks payment of $3,756.36 for telephone charges which were incurred by claimant on behalf of the respondent State agency. These telephone charges were not reimbursed by respondent to the claimant in the proper fiscal year; therefore, the claimant has not been paid. In its Answer, the respondent admits the validity and amount of the claim, and states that there were sufficient funds expired in the appropriate fiscal year with which the travel expenses could have been paid.

In view of the foregoing, the Court makes an award in the amount of $3,756.36.

Award of $3,756.36.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Ct. Cl. 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/division-of-highways-v-division-of-rehabilitation-services-wvctcl-1995.