Division of Environmental Protection v. Division of Corrections

West Virginia Court of Claims

Division of Environmental Protection v. Division of Corrections

23 Ct. Cl. 332

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedJune 29, 2001

DocketCC-01-178

StatusPublished

This text of 23 Ct. Cl. 332 (Division of Environmental Protection v. Division of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Division of Environmental Protection v. Division of Corrections, 23 Ct. Cl. 332 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This c laim w as submitted f or de cisión b ased u pon t he a negations in t he Notice of Claim and respondent's Answer.

Claimant seeks $189.00 for providing a Sludge Land Application Fee as required by law for Huttonsville Correctional Center, a facility of respondent in Huttonsville. The documentation for these services was not processed for payment within the appropriate fiscal year; therefore, claimant has not been paid. In its Answer, respondent admits the validity of the claim as well as the amount, and states that there were sufficient funds expired in the appropriate fiscal year from which the invoice could have been paid.

Accordingly, the Court makes an award to claimant in the amount of $189.00.

Award of $189.00.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This c laim w as submitted f or de cisión b ased u pon t he a negations in t he Notice of Claim and respondent's Answer.

Claimant seeks $189.00 for providing a Sludge Land Application Fee as required by law for Huttonsville Correctional Center, a facility of respondent in Huttonsville. The documentation for these services was not processed for payment within the appropriate fiscal year; therefore, claimant has not been paid. In its Answer, respondent admits the validity of the claim as well as the amount, and states that there were sufficient funds expired in the appropriate fiscal year from which the invoice could have been paid.

Accordingly, the Court makes an award to claimant in the amount of $189.00.

Award of $189.00.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 Ct. Cl. 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/division-of-environmental-protection-v-division-of-corrections-wvctcl-2001.