Division of Employment Security v. Payton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Division of Employment Security v. Payton

399 S.W.3d 518, 2013 WL 2300935, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 647

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 28, 2013·No. No. WD 75657·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

On May 18, 2012, Cassandra Payton’s employment was terminated by St. Louis University because she had redeemed meal vouchers which were not intended for employee use. The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission found that Payton had been terminated for misconduct, and denied her claim for unemployment benefits. Payton appeals. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

On May 18, 2012, Cassandra Payton’s employment was terminated by St. Louis University because she had redeemed meal vouchers which were not intended for employee use. The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission found that Payton had been terminated for misconduct, and denied her claim for unemployment benefits. Payton appeals. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Division of Employment Security v. Payton, 399 S.W.3d 518, 2013 WL 2300935, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 647 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

399 S.W.3d 518 (Division of Employment Security v. Payton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.