DIVISION 9 SERVICES, LLC v. WILLIAM SHIRE, PHILIP EMERT, D9 SERVICES, LLC AND RICHARD W. WOIKE

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 1, 2019
Docket19-0277
StatusPublished

This text of DIVISION 9 SERVICES, LLC v. WILLIAM SHIRE, PHILIP EMERT, D9 SERVICES, LLC AND RICHARD W. WOIKE (DIVISION 9 SERVICES, LLC v. WILLIAM SHIRE, PHILIP EMERT, D9 SERVICES, LLC AND RICHARD W. WOIKE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DIVISION 9 SERVICES, LLC v. WILLIAM SHIRE, PHILIP EMERT, D9 SERVICES, LLC AND RICHARD W. WOIKE, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

DIVISION 9 SERVICES, LLC, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 2D19-277 WILLIAM SHIRE, PHILIP EMERT, D9 ) SERVICES, LLC, and RICHARD W. ) WOIKE, ) ) Respondent. ) )

Opinion filed November 1, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Steven Scott Stephens, Judge.

Jason Sampson of Venerable Law, LLP, Tampa, for Petitioner.

Theodore J. Hamilton of Wetherington Hamilton, P.A., Tampa, for Respondents William Shire and Philip Emert.

No appearance for Respondent Richard W. Woike.

PER CURIAM.

Denied.

KHOUZAM, C.J., and VILLANTI and SLEET, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
DIVISION 9 SERVICES, LLC v. WILLIAM SHIRE, PHILIP EMERT, D9 SERVICES, LLC AND RICHARD W. WOIKE, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/division-9-services-llc-v-william-shire-philip-emert-d9-services-llc-fladistctapp-2019.