Diverging Diamond Interchange SW Permit

CourtVermont Superior Court
DecidedJuly 18, 2017
Docket50-6-16 Vtec
StatusPublished

This text of Diverging Diamond Interchange SW Permit (Diverging Diamond Interchange SW Permit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Vermont Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Diverging Diamond Interchange SW Permit, (Vt. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

STATE OF VERMONT

SUPERIOR COURT ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION Docket No. 50-6-16 Vtec

Diverging Diamond Interchange SW Permit

ENTRY REGARDING MOTION

Count 1, ANR Storm Water Permit (50-6-16 Vtec)

Title: Motion to Amend Statement of Questions (Motion 5) Filer: R.L. Vallee, Inc. Attorney: Jon T. Anderson

Filed Date: May 25, 2017 No response filed The motion is GRANTED.

This is an appeal by R.L. Vallee, Inc. (Vallee) from a permit issued by the Agency of Natural Resources (ANR) to the Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans) to discharge stormwater runoff from a proposed diverging diamond interchange at I-89 Exit 16 in Colchester.

Vallee explains that since filing its original Statement of Questions, further investigation has shed light on facts that resolve, moot, or clarify many of those original questions. Vallee therefore moves to withdraw its Questions 1-5, 7, 9-11, 13-14, and.18. Vallee also moves to clarify its Questions 12 and 19. Vallee has filed an Amended Statement of Questions reflecting these changes, with the remaining Questions numbered 1-18.

The other parties have not filed any pleadings in response to Vallee’s motion to amend.

We typically grant a motion to amend a statement of questions if doing so does not prejudice other parties, and if the motion is made in good faith, is not futile, and is not made to delay the proceedings. Buchwald Home Occupation CU Permit, No. 181-12-13 Vtec, slip op. at 2 (Vt. Super. Ct. Envtl. Div. Apr. 1, 2014) (Walsh, J.) (citations omitted). We are also prone to grant a motion to clarify when doing so serves to “clarify and focus the issues to be litigated.” Morrisville Hydroelectric Project Water Quality, No. 103-9-16 Vtec, slip op. at 2 (Vt. Super. Ct. Envtl. Div. Feb. 7, 2017) (Walsh, J.).

n,Q The motion here appears to have been made in good faith, will not prejudice other parties, and will help focus on the issues to be litigated. We therefore GRANT the motion to amend.

So ordered.

Electronically signed on July 18, 2017 at 11:22 AM pursuant to V.R.E.F. 7(d).

Tom Wy

Thomas G. Walsh, Judge Superior Court, Environmental Division

Notifications:

Jon T. Anderson (ERN 1856), Alexander J. LaRosa (ERN 5814), Attorneys for Appellant R.L. Vallee, Inc.

Justin E. Kolber (ERN 4303), John K. Dunleavy (ERN 1949), Attorneys for Appellee Agency of Transportation

David L. Grayck (ERN 4510), Attorney for Interested Person Timberlake Associates, LLP

Leslie A. Welts (ERN N/A), Hannah W. Smith (ERN 6759), Attorneys for Interested Person Agency of Natural Resources

Elena M. Mihaly (ERN 8101), Attorney for Intervenor Conservation Law Foundation

Gregory J. Boulbol (ERN 1712), Attorney for For Informational Purposes Only Natural Resources Board

Mark G. Hall (ERN 2537), Attorney for Intervenor Costco Wholesale Corp.

Peter J. Gill (ERN 4158), Attorney for For Informational Purposes Only Natural Resources Board

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Diverging Diamond Interchange SW Permit, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diverging-diamond-interchange-sw-permit-vtsuperct-2017.