DiVERGILIO v. CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF WEST BLOOMFIELD
741 N.W.2d 302, 480 Mich. 949
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in DiVERGILIO v. CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF WEST BLOOMFIELD. Read the opinion of the Court — 480 Mich. 1077 →
Opinion
Anthony DiVERGILIO, Jr. and Victoria A. Valentine, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants/Appellants,
v.
CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF WEST BLOOMFIELD, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Appellee, and
West Bloomfield Wetlands Review Board and West Bloomfield Board of Trustees, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motions for leave to file amicus curiae briefs are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the November 2, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
DiVERGILIO v. CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF WEST BLOOMFIELD, 741 N.W.2d 302, 480 Mich. 949 (Mich. 2007).
741 N.W.2d 302 (DiVERGILIO v. CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF WEST BLOOMFIELD) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.