Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Divack v. Flatbush Savings Bank

Divack v. Flatbush Savings Bank

260 A.D. 925, 23 N.Y.S.2d 24, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5485
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 4, 1940
StatusPublished

This text of 260 A.D. 925 (Divack v. Flatbush Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Divack v. Flatbush Savings Bank, 260 A.D. 925, 23 N.Y.S.2d 24, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5485 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

Action for specific performance. Appeal from order cancelling notice of pendency of action dismissed, without costs. On the argument it was admitted that the property which is the subject-matter of the action has been conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value. The appeal, therefore, has become academic and is dismissed. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 A.D. 925, 23 N.Y.S.2d 24, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/divack-v-flatbush-savings-bank-nyappdiv-1940.