Ditzler v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Federal Circuit

Ditzler v. Merit Systems Protection Board

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedSeptember 16, 2010

Docket2010-3148

StatusUnpublished

This text of Ditzler v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Ditzler v. Merit Systems Protection Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ditzler v. Merit Systems Protection Board, (Fed. Cir. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedentia1. United States Court of AppeaIs for the Federal Circuit LARRY D. DITZLER, Petiti0ner, V. -- MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Resp0ndent, ` AND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Interven,or. 2010-3148 Petition for review of the Merit Systems Pr0tection Board in case no. AT3330100136-I-1. ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of the unopposed motions to re- form the official caption to designate the Merit Systems Protection B0ard as the respondent and to permit the Department of Transportation to intervene, IT ls ORDERED THA'1‘:

DITZLER V. MSPB 2 The motions are granted The revised official caption is reflected above. FoR THE CoURT l 6 /s/ J an H0rba1y Date J an Horba1y Clerk ccc Norman H. Jackrnan, Esq. JeSsica R. Toplin, Esq. Jeffrey Gauger, Esq. _ s2O U.S. COUR'r| _ FEDsl’;Y:een~“ SE`P 1 6 2010 JAN HORBALY CLERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedentia1. United States Court of AppeaIs for the Federal Circuit LARRY D. DITZLER, Petiti0ner, V. -- MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Resp0ndent, ` AND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Interven,or. 2010-3148 Petition for review of the Merit Systems Pr0tection Board in case no. AT3330100136-I-1. ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of the unopposed motions to re- form the official caption to designate the Merit Systems Protection B0ard as the respondent and to permit the Department of Transportation to intervene, IT ls ORDERED THA'1‘:

DITZLER V. MSPB 2 The motions are granted The revised official caption is reflected above. FoR THE CoURT l 6 /s/ J an H0rba1y Date J an Horba1y Clerk ccc Norman H. Jackrnan, Esq. JeSsica R. Toplin, Esq. Jeffrey Gauger, Esq. _ s2O U.S. COUR'r| _ FEDsl’;Y:een~“ SE`P 1 6 2010 JAN HORBALY CLERK

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Ditzler v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ditzler-v-merit-systems-protection-board-cafc-2010.