Ditus v. Court
This text of Ditus v. Court (Ditus v. Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-15-0000951 09-AUG-2016 07:49 AM
SCWC-15-0000951
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
VONAH DITUS, FRED DITUS, and STONE DITUS, Respondents/Plaintiffs-Appellees,
vs.
ROGER COURT and ANGELA COURT, Petitioners/Defendants-Appellants.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-15-0000951; CIVIL NO. 3SS15-1-000230)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
The application for writ of certiorari, filed on July
5, 2016, is hereby rejected.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, August 9, 2016.
Roger and Angela Court /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald pro se /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ditus v. Court, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ditus-v-court-haw-2016.