Dittmer v. Scheyer

74 A.D.2d 828, 425 N.Y.S.2d 175, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10579
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 3, 1980
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 74 A.D.2d 828 (Dittmer v. Scheyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dittmer v. Scheyer, 74 A.D.2d 828, 425 N.Y.S.2d 175, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10579 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinions

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Islip denying petitioner’s application for certain variances, petitioner appeals from (1) a decision of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated November 8, 1978, which held that the petition should be dismissed and (2) the judgment entered thereon on August 10, 1979. Appeal from decision dismissed, without costs or disbursements. No appeal lies from a decision. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Each of the provisions of the Islip zoning ordinance under which petitioner sought permission to build as a single and separate owner requires compliance with all zoning requirements other than the one for which the single and separate dispensation is conferred (see Town of Islip Amended Zoning Ordinance, § 68-81, subd C; § 68-85, subd D; see, also, § 68-83, subd C). Since petitioner’s application failed to demonstrate such compliance, Special Term correctly held that petitioner was not entitled to the variances as a matter of right under the ordinance and therefore the respondent zoning board of appeals had discretion to deny the requested variances. In our opinion, the board’s denial in this case was supported by substantial evidence and was not affected by any error of law (see CPLR 7803, subds 3, 4; Matter of Cowan v Kern, 41 NY2d 591; Matter of Sofo v Egan, 57 AD2d 841). Mollen, P. J., Damiani and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kransteuber v. Scheyer
176 A.D.2d 724 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Rider v. Board of Appeals of Town of Islip
172 A.D.2d 673 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Woodmaster Homes, Ltd. v. Scheyer
171 A.D.2d 666 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Hansen v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Islip
158 A.D.2d 689 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Keunen v. Scheyer
156 A.D.2d 563 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Snyder v. Scheyer
153 A.D.2d 630 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Siciliano v. Scheyer
150 A.D.2d 460 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Lakeland Park Estates, Inc. v. Scheyer
142 A.D.2d 582 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Kast v. Casey
129 A.D.2d 641 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Jennings v. Kern
134 Misc. 2d 590 (New York Supreme Court, 1987)
Pellati v. Scheyer
115 A.D.2d 606 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 A.D.2d 828, 425 N.Y.S.2d 175, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dittmer-v-scheyer-nyappdiv-1980.